Here is an example of the problem for skydemon from this post on PPRune:



Been to Le Touquet and back today with the 795, and I have to say it's stunning.



Although it doesn't actually do a lot more than the 695, it's just SO fast to navigate round that you have way more info available instantly.



I still had my trusty SkyDemon on for the better (IMHO) airspace warnings, which is a bit of a waste of space, but will probably move completely over to the Garmin once I'm more confortable with it.



Quite clearly he says that skydemon has better airspace warnings (but then says is a waste of space???) but ultimately he says he will become a Garmin user rather than a Skydemon users. Thats not what we want.



Please develop some sort of Syn Vis if possible.

Beech Bonanza A36 Based at Blackpool

G-FOZZ www.gotoair.com

I posted a while ago that this was the only thing that could make Skydemon better. I had ditched my Garmin 396 and years of trusty service and moved to Skydemon only but now I am hankering after a 795. I really hope that SD will do it as it is otherwise going to inevitably see people looking at Garmin again, despite the huge price.



I love Skydemon but I have to say I really want synthetic vision. I dont mind the price but SD should have it! Having built by far the best software for VFR flight dont let Garmin get one up on you now.

Beech Bonanza A36 Based at Blackpool

G-FOZZ www.gotoair.com

Reading between the lines does that then imply you are developing an IFR version of skydemon then?

That would come under the heading of a special IFR version of SkyDemon, which we haven't announced anything about at this time.

I think Slydemon is at a point now were it simply can't be made any better for VFR flight. So how about adding synthetic vision and IFR approach plates say the gCAP ones?